Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Buck

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 10, 1905PublishedCited by 55 opinions

Appecfl from Scott Distñct Court.— Hon. Jas. W. Bol-LINGER, Judge. Suit to recover damages for a personal injury. There was a directed verdict for the defendant, and a judgment thereon, from which the plaintiff appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtShebwik, C. J.

At the time of the accident causing the plaintiff’s injuries the defendant was a dealer in agricultural implements, buggies, automobiles, etc., in the city of Davenport, and his son Emil I. Buck was in his employ as a clerk. There was an automobile parade in the city of Davenpprt in the afternoon of the day in question, and, on the solicitation of the committee having the matter in charge, the defendant decorated an electric automobile belonging to him, and the machine, operated by one of his daughters, had a place in the parade. The son, Emil J., who had been employed in his father’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meyer v. HouckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Griffin v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  3. Linville v. . NissenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Slater v. Advance Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Guthrie v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API