Legal Opinion

Provience v. Valley Clerks Trust Fund

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1984No. Civ. 23589PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

In this case, we hold that tort claims for fraud, bad faith denial of benefits, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, asserted by an employee against an employee benefit plan subject to ERISA, 1 are preempted by ERISA and may not be litigated in the state courts of California.

Factual and Procedural Background

In June 1978 plaintiff obtained employment with Raley’s Markets. Raley’s offered plaintiff participation in one of two medical payment plans as a benefit of his employment. Plaintiff chose Valley Clerks Trust Fund (Fund), an employee benefit plan subject to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Lewis v. Benedict Coal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Takeda v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Martori Bros. Distributors v. James-MassengaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Kurtz, Richards, Wilson & Co. v. Insurance Communicators Marketing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Sciborski v. Pacific Bell DirectoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. SonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API