Legal Opinion
Kurtz, Richards, Wilson & Co. v. Insurance Communicators Marketing Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 27, 1993No. B056950PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, J.
Kurtz, Richards, Wilson & Co., Inc. (KRW) appeals from a judgment that it take nothing on its cross-complaint against respondents, entered after a demurrer was sustained without leave to amend as to two causes of action and summary judgment was granted as to the remaining cause of action. We reverse the judgment and remand the case to the trial court with directions to sustain the demurrer with leave to amend and to deny the motion for summary judgment.
Factual and Procedural Summary
In 1985, as part of its search for group medical, life, and accident insurance for its…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Good v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998
- MacEy v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Desai v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Krumme v. Mercury InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Chicago Title Insurance v. AMZ Insurance Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.