Legal Opinion

People v. Ramos

California Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1984No. Crim. 21352PublishedCited by 246 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, J.

This case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. When it was last here, we concluded that no reversible error had occurred at the guilt phase of defendant’s trial, but that an instruction given at the penalty phase—the so-called Briggs Instruction, described below-violated the federal Constitution and required a reversal of the penalty judgment and a remand for further proceedings. (People v. Ramos (1982) 30 Cal.3d 553 [180 Cal.Rptr. 266, 639 P.2d 908] [Ramos I].) In light of our ruling on the Briggs Instruction, we did not reach other claims of error…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by246 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

241 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API