People v. Ramos
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, J.
This case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. When it was last here, we concluded that no reversible error had occurred at the guilt phase of defendant’s trial, but that an instruction given at the penalty phase—the so-called Briggs Instruction, described below-violated the federal Constitution and required a reversal of the penalty judgment and a remand for further proceedings. (People v. Ramos (1982) 30 Cal.3d 553 [180 Cal.Rptr. 266, 639 P.2d 908] [Ramos I].) In light of our ruling on the Briggs Instruction, we did not reach other claims of error…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by246 opinions
- State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
241 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.