Chicago Telephone Supply Co. v. Marne & Elkhorn Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Shelby District Court.— Hon. O. D. Wheeler, Judge. Action to recover the purchase price of one hundred and four telephones sold by plaintiff to defendant. Defendant pleaded a breach of warranty and return of the telephones and rescission of the contract on that ground. Trial to a jury. Verdict and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.—
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
On May 30, 1904, the defendant, through its president and secretary, gave plaintiff’s agent the following order for telephones:
Chicago Telephone Company,
Salesman, Lowry.
Sold to Marne & Elkhorn Telephone Company.
Shipped by freight, prepaid.
Number. Price.
48. No. 33, 1,600 ohm bridging at............ $11.50
To Exira, Iowa, 24. No. 33, 1,600 ohm bridging at. ............ $11.50
To Walnut, Iowa. 32. No. 33, 1,600 ohm bridging at............ $11.50
To Brayton, Iowa.
*254Batteries and R. H. blued screws furnished free. On this order and future orders placed by this company 1 telephone free with every 15…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. MuggIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Forcheimer & Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- J. I. Case Threshing-Machine Co. v. HavenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Powell v. ChittickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Horner v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Pond v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Canfield ex rel. Canfield v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- State v. MarcusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Hinnah v. SeabaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.