Legal Opinion

Horner v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 30, 1915PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from, Pottawattamie District Court. — Hon. Thomas Arthur, Judge. Action to specifically enforce an alleged contract of Geo. H. and E. May Crisp to leave plaintiff all tbeir property. From a decree entered as prayed, the defendants appeal.—

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

1. Specific pekFOKMANCE : wills: agreement to make: degree of proof. — I. The plaintiff is the child of Mollie Cine, born out of wedlock, who became a member of the household of Geo. H. and Elizabeth May Crisp early in 1888. She was first cared for by them at the instance of her mother, and afterwards, on April 17th of that year, articles of adoption in due form were signed by the mother and the Crisps. Therein the mother yielded the custody of her child and the Crisps undertook to adopt her as their own in accordance with the statutes of Iowa, and agreed that they would “nurture, support and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Rosseau v. . RoussNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Chehak v. BattlesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Jordan v. Abney, AdministratorTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Stiles v. BreedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Stewart v. ToddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. In Re Estate of ConnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  3. Stonewall v. DanielsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Partello v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. Sharpe v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API