Forcheimer & Co. v. Stewart
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Pottawattamie District Gourt. Action to recover upon an alleged breach of warranty in a contract of sale of a certain lot of hams. There was a trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment were rendered for the defendant. The plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The plaintiffs are provision dealers residing and doing business in the city of Mobile, Alabama. The defendant is a pork-packer residing and doing business in the city of Council Bluffs, Iowa. In August, 1881, he entered into a contract through his broker, one 0. Wilson, located at Mobile, for the sale of a large quantity of hams, and shipped the same on the nineteenth day of that month. The bains arrived in Mobile in due course of transportation, and in about ten days. The plaintiffs had paid for them on the twenty-fourth of that month, and while the same were in transit. They aver that they…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Merchants' National Bank of Cincinnati v. BangsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gould v. SteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Malone v. DawsonTexas Supreme Court · 1928
- Northwestern Cordage Co. v. RiceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Latham v. ShipleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Hamilton v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.