McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Richardson
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Kossuth District Court. — Hon. Q-eorge H. Carr, Judge. Action on a written order'forbindingtwine. From a verdict and judgment for the defendant, the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.
The petition alleges that on January-31, 1891, the defendant entered into the following written order:
“January 31, 1891.
Mr. W. S. Krebs, Albert Lea, Minn.:
Please ship McCormick binder twine as follows:
167 bales Standard, mixed, 5 lb. balls, 60 lbs each............10,020 lbs.
50 bales Pure Sisal, 5 lb. balls, 60 lbs each................. 3,000 lbs.
117 bales New Zealand, % and 5 lb. balls, 60 lbs each..... 7,020 lbs.
20,040 lbs.
to M. Richardson, Algona, Iowa, on or about May 1, by C. & N. W. R’y, for which I agree to pay, f. o. b. cars in Chicago, as follows: Standard Mixed, ten and one half…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moline Scale Co. v. BeedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Goodpaster v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
- McAlister v. SafleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Methodist Episcopal Church of Sun Prairie v. ShermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Greve v. GangerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Port Huron MacHinery Co. v. WohlersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- American Oak Leather Co. v. Porter Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Chicago Telephone Supply Co. v. Marne & Elkhorn Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Nebraska Bridge Supply & Lumber Co. v. ConwaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- J. L. Owens Co. v. BemisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.