Legal Opinion

ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Unlimited Automotive, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 9, 1992No. 92 C 1059PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Presently before the court are the motions of defendants Bank One Milwaukee, N.A. (“Bank One”) and Richard Messenger to dismiss respectively Counts III and IV of plaintiffs second-amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, we deny both motions.

I. Motion to Dismiss Standard

A motion to dismiss should not be granted unless it “appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claims which would entitle him to relief.” Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gard v. Teletronics Pacing Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1994
  2. Lindsay v. KvortekDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Bright v. Roadway Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  4. Azimi v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  5. Elftmann v. Village of Tinley ParkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API