Legal Opinion

Chilingirian v. City of Fraser

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1992No. Docket 120702PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJansen, J.

Plaintiff, Jack C. Chilingirian, appeals as of right from the trial court’s August 28, 1989, order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(0(10). We affirm.

On December 8, 1983, defendant City of Fraser retained the law firm of Berschback, Kerwin, Locicero, Brennan and Chilingirian as legal counsel for the city. Plaintiff is a member of the firm and was responsible for much of the city’s litigation. On July 23, 1987, the individual defendants, in their capacity as city council members, voted to dismiss plaintiff from all city business effective August 1, 1987.

P…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nichol v. BillotMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Goodchild v. EricksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Hopkins v. City of MidlandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Covell v. SpenglerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Wagner v. Regency Inn Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ashker v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Driver v. HanleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Terzano v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Rakowski v. SarbMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Mantei v. Michigan Public School Employees Retirement SystemMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API