Terzano v. Wayne County
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
In this whistleblower’s case, defendants appeal by leave granted a judgment in plaintiff’s favor entered following a jury trial. On appeal, defendants raise an issue regarding the breadth of § 2 of the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (wpa), MCL 15.362; MSA 17.428(2). We affirm and hold, inter alia, that an employee who reports third-party violations of law or suspected violations of law is protected by the wpa when the employee acts within the scope of employment and the reported violation or suspected violation affects the business of the employer.
i
Plaintiff is a licensed electrician who was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Matras v. Amoco Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Dudewicz v. Norris Schmid, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Hopkins v. City of MidlandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Chilingirian v. City of FraserMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Shallal v. Catholic Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Kimmelman v. Heather Downs Management LimitedMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Houghton Lake Area Tourism & Convention Bureau v. WoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Ansell v. Department of Commerce (On Remand)Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.