Legal Opinion
Hartford-Empire Co. v. Nivison-Weiskopf Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 12, 1932No. 5752, 5753, 5997-6000PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.
The Hartford-Empire Company brought suit against the Nivison-Weiskopf Company in the District Court for infringement of ,the Steimer patent, 1,564,909, the Peiler patent, 1,573,742, known as the “phase change” patent, and Peiler patent, 1,589,304, referred to as the “shear-height” patent. Subsequently it brought suit against the Kearns-Gorsuch Bottle Company for infringement of the same three patents and another Peiler patent, 1,631,107, referred to as the “whittling” patent. Suit was also brought by the Hartford Company against the Lamb Glass Company on the Steimer…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Webster Electric Co. v. Splitdorf Electrical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Woodbridge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Directoplate Corp. v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Macbeth-Evans Glass Co. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Hartford-Empire Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1942
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Ferdinand Gutmann & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1936
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.