Legal Opinion

Directoplate Corp. v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 2, 1931No. 5630PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant brought its action in the court below alleging infringement of claims 1, 5, 8, and 12 of patent No-. 1,396,962, and claims 4, 5, 7, 20, 23, 25, 41, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 67, 68, and 69 of reissue patent No. 16,567. Both patents originated in applications filed by one Alexander T. Koppe and are hereinafter-respectively referred to as Koppe’s first and second patents. The first patent was for a “vacuum-pressure frame” designed and intended (according to the specification) as appropriate for use in “a machine for making offset press plates.” The second…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Royal Typewriter Co. v. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
  3. Gustav H. Bobertz, Jr. v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  4. General Motors Corporation v. Rubsam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  5. Detroit Stoker Co. v. Brownell Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API