Tower v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
LawreNCE, Judge:
A commodity described on the commercial invoice accompanying the entry herein as “Abrasive Sludge 81” and imported from Canada was classified by the collector of customs as “Ferrosilicon, containing 8 per centum or more of silicon and less than 30 per centum” within the provisions of paragraph 302 (i) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. §1001, par. 302 (i)), as modified by the trade agreement between the United States and Canada (74 Treas. Dec. 235, T. D. 49752), and duty was accordingly assessed thereon at the rate of 1 cent per pound on the silicon contained therein.
Plaint…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pickhardt v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Cadwalader v. ZehSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Seeberger v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- American Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Philipp Bros. Ore v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- C. J. Tower & Sons v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Best Key Textiles Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014