Philipp Bros. Ore v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge:
The merchandise involved in this case is described on the invoice as tantalite-columbite concentrate and was assessed with duty by the collector at 15 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 214 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 51802, as earthy or mineral substances, wholly or partly manufactured, not decorated. It is claimed in the protest, as amended, that the merchandise is free of duty under paragraph 1664 of said tariff act as a metallic mineral substance in a crude state, or under paragraph 1119 of said tariff act as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- American Smelting & Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Hampton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- O. G. Hempstead & Son v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- American Smelting & Repining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Lead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- Englehardt Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969