Legal Opinion
Reingold v. New York Life Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 22, 1936No. 8070PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Harry Reingold, as guardian of appellant Rose Reingold, an insane person (hereinafter called the insured), and the insured, by her said guardian, brought this suit against appellees New York Life Insurance Company (hereinafter called the Company) and Ben Reingold. The complaint prayed for a decree adjudging and declaring that a certain insurance policy issued by the Company to the insured on, or as of, May 12, 1922, had not lapsed, as claimed by the Company, but was in full force and effect; that the insured was entitled to the disability benefits provided for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NY v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Williams v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Sleicher v. SleicherNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Reynolds v. Travelers Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fortis Benefits Insurance v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1997
- Hinkley v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1941
- Saul v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Nalley v. New York Life Ins.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1943
- Pearlstein v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1949