Legal Opinion
Saul v. New York Life Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 8, 1937No. 8402PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
Joseph Saul sought to recover of New York Life Insurance Company disability benefits included in a policy of life insurance, and his petition was dismissed on demurrer.
The pertinent language of the policy is: “Upon receipt at the Company’s Home Office before default in payment of premium of due proof that the insured is totally and presumably permanently disabled and that such disability occurred after the insurance took effect and before its anniversary on which the insured’s age at nearest birthday is sixty years, the following benefits will be granted: (a) Income…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Sun Insurance Office v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Jalonick v. Greene County Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shank v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
- Nalley v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Nalley v. New York Life Ins.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1943