Legal Opinion
Hinkley v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided February 17, 1941No. 21PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELLENBACH, District Judge.
On June 30, 1930, defendant entered into an insurance contract with Jack T. French of Los Angeles, California. In it defendant insured the life of French in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000). It provided for the payment of premiums quarterly on the twenty-fifth day of September, December, March and June of each year. Attached to and made a part of the contract was a supplemental agreement providing for total and permanent disability benefits and double indemnity benefit. (Since double indemnity is not involved here, no further reference to that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Minnesota Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Reynolds v. Travelers Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
- Wick v. Western Union Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Ferguson v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Telefilm, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Anderson v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Lemaire v. Continental Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Kendall v. Travelers Ins.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1942
- Harrison v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.