Legal Opinion

Argus v. Johns

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1928No. Docket No. 72, Calendar No. 33,724PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiffs and defendants are adjoining landowners. Plaintiffs filed a bill of complaint in the circuit court of Oakland county, in chancery, to restrain defendants from removing, tearing down, or destroying a fence erected by plaintiffs on what they claim to be the true boundary line between their lands and those of defendants. Defendants answered claiming plaintiffs had wrongfully undertaken to erect a line fence not on the true boundary line between the premises. There was decree for defendants’, and plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiffs claimed the boundary line had been established for 50 years.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Smith v. HamiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Stewart v. CarletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Hanlon v. Ten HoveMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Joyce v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Sheldon v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Warner v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Lamberton v. PawloskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Beaver v. ZwonackMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API