Legal Opinion

Warner v. Noble

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1938No. Docket No. 65, Calendar No. 40,104PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff in chancery had decree against defendants “that plaintiff, Frank J. Warner, is the owner in fee simple of premises in the township of Lawrence, Van Burén county, Michigan, described as: “commencing’ at a point 25 feet west of the northwest corner of lot 10 Harold E. Abrams Christie Lake subdivision, thence southerly to the southwest corner of said lot 10, thence northerly to the northwest corner of said lot 10, thence west to beginning, being’ a part of the southeast fractional quarter of section 26, town 3 south, range 15 west; by reason of his distinct, continuous, notorious,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Morris v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Maslen v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Horton v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Kirkwood v. HoxieMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Bischoff v. County of WayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. In Re Estate of FraserMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Township of Warren v. RaymondMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Lehman v. LehmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Harlow v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API