Legal Opinion

Hanlon v. Ten Hove

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1926No. Docket No. 42PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Plaintiff holds the record title to the east half of lot 2 of block 367 of the revised plat of the city of Muskegon. Defendant Andrew Ten Hove holds the record title to lot 15 and the westerly 3 feet of lot 14 of the same block.' Defendant Elizabeth Ten Hove is his wife. These lots face on Third street and are business property. We take it they were formerly part, of the west half of the block. This action of ejectment involved the boundary line at the rear of the business lots. Shortly before bringing the action plaintiff employed a surveyor who determined that the block overruns and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Diehl v. ZangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Smith v. HamiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Stewart v. CarletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Sheldon v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Jones v. PashbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Bahr v. ImusUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Home Owners' Loan Corporation v. DudleyUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Neill v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  4. Gregory v. ThorrezMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Zemon v. NetzorgMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API