Parker v. Hughes
Supreme Court of Kansas
Original proceeding, in quo warranto. In banc.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Cunningham, J.:
At the spring election of 1901, in the city of Topeka, plaintiff and defendant were opposing candidates for the office of mayor. The plaintiff had received the nomination from the democratic party and had also been nominated at a meeting of citizens, so that his name appeared twice upon the official ballot. The defendant was the regular nominee of the republican party and had been declared elected by the proper board of canvassers. (Hughes v. Parker, 63 Kan. 297, 65 Pac. 265.) This is an original proceeding in quo warranto to determine…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Feeny v. . Bd. of CanvassersNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- State ex rel. Orr v. FawcettWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Nicholls v. BarrickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- Attorney General ex rel. Scott v. GlaserMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Sawin v. PeaseWyoming Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Partido Nuevo Progresista (P.N.P.) v. Rodríguez EstradaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1988
- Doll v. BenderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
- McGrane v. County of Nez PerceIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Bloedel v. CromwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Stanhope v. Rural High-school District No. 1Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.