Attorney General ex rel. Scott v. Glaser
Michigan Supreme Court
Information in the nature of quo warranto to determine the title to the office of comptroller of West Bay City. The'facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is a contest over the office of comptroller of West Bay City. A recount was had under *397the provisions of Act No. 208, Laws of 1887. Upon the recount as made by the common council, the respondent received a majority of 9. There were cast for the relator 1,169 votes which were undisputed, and for the respondent 1,147 votes which were undisputed. There were counted for the respondent an additional 40 votes whieh it is claimed by the relator should not have been counted, and there were counted for the relator 9' additional votes which it is claimed by the respondent should not have been…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Parvin v. WimbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Sego v. StoddardIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Curran v. ClaytonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1893
3Cited by21 opinions
- Black v. PateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Peterson v. BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1939
- Groesbeck v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Bloedel v. CromwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Parker v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.