Kinderman v. Kinderman

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered in this dissolution of marriage action.1 He claims that the trial court erred in making various financial orders and in denying his motion for modification of periodic alimony. We find error.

The trial court found the following facts. The parties were married on October 12, 1963, and have two children, who had reached the age of majority by the time of the dissolution. The plaintiff was 49 years old and recently had been employed as the president of Asta Designs, Inc. As president, he earned a salary of approximately $90,000 yearly. The…