Legal Opinion

Mulholland v. Mulholland

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 11, 1992No. 10206PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

In this dissolution action, the defendant appeals challenging financial orders of the trial court. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) entered the order of child support in order to balance the incomes of the parties, (2) adjusted the child support order to account for a shared custody order, (3) failed to consider the child support guidelines, (4) based the child support order on the defendant’s gross rather than net income, (5) imposed a higher support obligation for the younger of the two minor children, (6) awarded alimony, and (7) based its financial orders on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pasquariello v. PasquarielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. Ehrenkranz v. EhrenkranzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  3. Sunbury v. SunburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Battersby v. BattersbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Serrano v. SerranoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Michel v. MichelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. Mulholland v. MulhollandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Puris v. PurisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Mulholland v. MulhollandConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  5. Lake v. LakeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API