Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Guillory

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 22, 1946No. 37862PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PONDER, Justice.

On account of a dispute between the landowner and various persons claiming royalty interest in the oil, gas and other minerals produced from a certain tract of land, the Humble Oil and Refining Company, owner of the mineral lease under which the production was obtained, instituted these concursus.proceedings in order that it might be determined who is entitled to the royalty interests.

On January 19, 1923, Arceus Guillory sold to Augustus Hill Garland the “undivided one-fourth interest in and to all royalties stipulated for or hereafter to be stipulated for, in any oil, gas or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vincent v. BullockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. Roberson v. Pioneer Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  3. Tyson v. SpearmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  4. Bristo v. Christine Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  5. Posey v. FargoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Continental Oil Co. v. LandrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. Union Sulphur Co. v. AndrauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  3. Tidelands Royalty "B" Corp. v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. Union Sulphur Co. v. LognionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  5. Le Blanc v. Haynesville Mercantile Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API