Legal Opinion

Tidelands Royalty "B" Corp. v. Gulf Oil Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1987No. 85-1506PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents a question of first impression involving oil and gas law. The question is whether, under Louisiana law, the grant of an overriding mineral royalty by a mineral lessee imposes an implied obligation on the lessee to protect the royalty owner from drainage caused by the lessee’s operations on adjacent lands. 1 We answer neither affirmatively nor negatively. Instead, we answer the question with another question: is the diminution of the royalty owners’ payments the result of a breach of the lessee's implied obligation to act in good faith with respect to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Manges v. GuerraTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Vincent v. BullockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  3. Sauder v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Breaux v. Pan American Petroleum CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Wier v. GrubbSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re BassTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Total E & P USA, Inc. v. Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  3. Brannon v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. Continental Potash, Inc. v. Freeport-McMoran, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Finley v. Marathon Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API