Legal Opinion

Le Blanc v. Haynesville Mercantile Company, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 7, 1956No. 42396PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Chief Justice.

The defendant, Haynesville Mercantile Company, Inc., Trustee, is appealing from a. judgment of the district court decreeing a certain mineral royalty interest conveyed to it on March 19, 1940, by instrument executed in its favor by the landowners, plaintiff Elia Dugas and her husband, Alcide LeBlanc, 1 to have prescribed, and in addition ordering it to pay attorney’s fees of $300. The case was submitted to the trial judge on an agreed statement of facts which are stipulated in the record and are substantially as follows:

The royalty interest in dispute conveyed a Yeith…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vincent v. BullockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. Union Oil Company of California v. TouchetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  3. Sohio Petroleum Co. v. v. S. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  4. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. GuillorySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  5. St. Martin Land Co. v. PinckneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Whitehall Oil Company v. HeardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Delatte v. WoodsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  3. Mire v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
  4. Crown Central Petroleum Corporation v. BarousseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  5. Frey v. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API