Legal Opinion
Hexom v. Oregon Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 18, 1999No. 98-35500PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge:
Charles R. Hexom filed this action against the Oregon Department of Transportation 2 for the purpose of enjoining the DOT from imposing a $4 fee for the issuance of or renewal of disabled person parking permits in the form of individual placards or decals. See Or.Rev.Stat. §§ 811.602, 811.640 (1998). He asserted that the fee violated the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213. The district court *1135determined that the fee was a tax. It, therefore, found that the Tax Injunction Act stripped it of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1341.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- San Juan Cellular Telephone Company, Etc. v. Public Service Commission of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Trailer Marine Transport Corp. v. Carmen M. Rivera Vazquez, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Marcus v. Kansas, Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Bidart Brothers, a California Corporation v. The California Apple CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Botosan v. Paul McNally RealtyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Thomas Alan SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Robert W. Hall v. Gale A. Norton, Secretary of the Interior United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Schnabel v. LuiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Hedgepeth v. TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.