Legal Opinion

Contreras v. Fitzgerald

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2002No. 01-372PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 Carmen G. Contreras sued Sarah Fitzgerald in the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County. Fitzgerald counterclaimed. The counterclaim is all that remains of the case. Both parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. On March 19, 2001, the Honorable John S. Henson granted Contreras’ motion and denied Fitzgerald’s motion. Fitzgerald appeals. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

¶2 The following issues are dispositive of this appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err when it concluded that Fitzgerald passed in a no-passing zone?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err when it…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bruner v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Mead v. M.S.B., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Montana Metal Buildings, Inc. v. ShapiroMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Werre v. DavidMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Brohman v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Faulconbridge v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Saari v. Winter Sports, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Masters Group International, Inc. v. Comerica BankMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Signal Perfection, Ltd. v. Rocky Mountain BankMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Marriage of Crone v. CroneMontana Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API