Legal Opinion

Mula v. Meyer

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 1955No. Civ. 16268PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiff, Victor Mula, an employee of a subcontractor, appeals from an adverse judgment rendered in an action brought by him against defendant Oscar W. Meyer, the general contractor, for damages for personal injuries plaintiff received while working on the job, it being claimed that such injuries were proximately caused by the failure of defendant to install a safety device required by law.

The defendant, on October 2, 1950, as general contractor, was engaged in the construction of a house. Plaintiff was working on that house as an employee of the heating contractor. On the date of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Polk v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Shanley v. American Olive Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Edwards v. Hollywood CanteenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Haft v. Lone Palm HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. United States v. Alice L. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Florez v. Groom Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Atherley v. MacDonald, Young & Nelson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Porter v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API