Grantz v. Jenkins
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garfield County; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by D. L. Jenkins and G. W. Jenkins, partners doing business under the name of Jenkins & Son, against A. R. Grantz. Judgment for plaintiffs, motion for new trial overruled, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
DAYIS, G.
This action was begun by defendants in error, hereinafter referred to as pmindffs, against the plaintiff in error, hereináfter referred to as defendant, before J. V. Ratcliffe, a justice of the peace of Garfield county, Okla., to recover the sum of $147.87 alleged to be due plaintiffs from defendant. It appears that plaintiffs are engaged in the mercantile business at Hunter, Okla. Clarence E. Meyers, a son-in-law of defendant, was doing business with plaintiffs and had become indebted to them in the sum of about $25. Plaintiffs refused to extend any further credit to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mulhall v. MulhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Board of Comrs. of Washita Co. v. HubbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Farmers' & Merchants' Bank of Coweta v. SharumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Lindley v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen v. FurmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Allen v. Oklahoma State Bank of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Whitehead Coal Mining Co. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Bond v. KruggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Sheean v. WaldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Whitlatch v. MaupinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949