Legal Opinion

Allen v. Oklahoma State Bank of Enid

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 2, 1928No. 18483PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASON, Y. C. J.

The Oklahoma State Bhnk of Enid, as plaintiff, commenced this action against Will C. Allen to recover the sum of $1,408.90, with interest and attorney’s fe'e, upon a promissory note execut&L and delivered by said defendant to the p’.aintiff bank.

" The bank contended that in the year 1920, one G. E. Darland borrowed from said hank the sum of $1,000 and that the defendant, Allen, was an indorser thereon; that when said note became due, Darland failed to pay and discharge the obligation, and the defendant, in ord'er to discharge his liability thereon, took up said note and, as a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Taunton & South Boston Turnpike Corp. v. WhitingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  2. Hutchins v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Lusk v. HaleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Security Nat. Bank v. BohnefeldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Felt v. WestlakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hatten R. Co. v. Baylies Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Fipps v. StidhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Wagoner Oil & Gas Co. v. MarlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Skaggs v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Banta v. HestandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API