Legal Opinion

Whitlatch v. Maupin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 4, 1949No. 33438PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, V.C.J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Ottawa county in favor of the plaintiff there in a suit on open account.

Plaintiff was engaged in the sale and delivery of gasoline and oils in Miami. He purchased his stock from the Tydol Oil Company and retailed the same to his local customers. Orville Whitlatch and Edith Whitlatch, defendant, were husband and wife and Orville operated a farm on which they lived. A tank and pump were installed on the farm for convenience in the operation of the farm machinery. In such instances it was customary for the Tydol Oil Company…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. May v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Kesler and Dodson v. CheadleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  3. Mayor v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Parsons v. EiseleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Grantz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mann v. WelchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API