Legal Opinion

Odom v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 1, 2002No. 25490PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice:

We granted a 'writ of certiorari in this post-conviction relief (PCR) case 1 to consider whether an oral waiver of presentment is sufficient to bestow subject matter jurisdiction on the trial court. We find it is not and reverse the denial of PCR.

FACTS

Petitioner Odom pled guilty to second degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor. At the plea hearing, the Solicitor alerted the trial judge that the indictment had not been true billed. The trial judge then questioned petitioner as follows:

THE COURT: This case involving criminal sexual conduct has not been before the grand jury.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. EvansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Summerall v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. ClarksonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SmallsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API