Legal Opinion

State v. Clarkson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 8, 1999No. 3069PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, Judge:

Edward M. Clarkson contends his oral waiver of indictment failed to comply with statutory requirements thus rendering the circuit court without jurisdiction to hear his guilty plea to assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature (ABHAN). We agree. 1

FACTS

Clarkson furnished alcoholic beverages to five minor, male victims and bought the victims numerous gifts. Clarkson performed oral sex on two victims. He also grabbed one victim’s genitals which served as the basis for the ABHAN charge.

The grand jury indicted Clarkson for two counts of second degree criminal sexual conduct…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Jefferson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Odom v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. ClarksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. ElliottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. ElliottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API