Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Gentry

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 7, 2005No. 25949Published

1DissentPleicones, J.

APPENDIX

While perhaps not a complete listing of all the cases affected by this decision, the following cases are overruled to the extent they combine the concept of the sufficiency of an indictment and the concept of subject matter jurisdiction, i.e. a trial court’s power to hear a charge:

1. Koon v. State, 358 S.C. 359, 595 S.E.2d 456 (2004).

2. Thompson v. State, 357 S.C. 192, 593 S.E.2d 139 (2004).

3. Mathis v. State, 355 S.C. 87, 584 S.E.2d 366 (2003).

4. State v. Knuckles, 354 S.C. 626, 583 S.E.2d 51 (2003).

5. Cohen v. State, 354 S.C. 563, 582 S.E.2d 403 (2003).

6. Cutner v. State, 354 S.C.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Browning v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. MunnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. PrimusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API