Batten v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
This civilian pay case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment. After considering the motions, and after oral argument, the court concludes that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and the defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
I
Plaintiffs, civilian employees of the Navy, hold "production facilitating” (or "production support”) positions bear*329ing the title "Planners and Estimators.” During most of their time in federal employ, plaintiffs’ rate of pay was related to the rate of pay of "wage…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Kirby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Amell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- John Burich v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wells v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Development Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Baka v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Jaynes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Development Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.