Legal Opinion

Standard Amusement Co. v. Tarkington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Ctjeiam.

This case was here at the Fall Term, 1957. Amusement Co. v. Tarkington, 247 N.C. 444, 101 S.E. 2d 398. In the present appeal, plaintiff filed no ’exceptions to defendants’ case on appeal and the case was not settled by the trial jttdge. Plaintiff filed motion in this Court to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the evidence in the case on appeal is not in narrative form. Rule 19 (4), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, 556. All the testimony in the-case on appeal is in question andi answer form. Rule 19(4) is mandatory and failure to comply therewith…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hall v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. STANDARD AMUSEMENT COMPANY v. TarkingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Anderson v. Wray Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Laughinghouse v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Whiteside v. Ralston Purina Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. ANSON BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. HenrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API