Whiteside v. Ralston Purina Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
Practically all the evidence in the case is by question and answer, and not in narrative form as required by Rule 19 (4), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, p. 556.
This Rule provides that the evidence “shall be in narrative form, and not by question and answer, except that a question and answer, or a series of them, may be set out when the subj ect of a particular exception.” Here the instances in which the question and answer form is necessary to point up an exception are nebulous. The Rule further *592provides that “If the case is settled by agreement of counsel, or the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Anderson v. Wray Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Laughinghouse v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Standard Amusement Co. v. TarkingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Huie v. TempletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957