Legal Opinion

Fidelity Etc. Co. v. State Bank of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1925PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBand, J.

On February 16, 1922, the State Bank of Portland, a banking corporation organized under the laws of this state, had become insolvent, and the defendant F. C. Bramwell, as State Superintendent of Banks, took charge of its assets for the purpose of liquidation. At that time, the State of Oregon had on deposit therein various sums of money, which with interest thereon amounted to the total sum of $151,783.35. In order to secure the state for the repayment of these sums, that bank as principal, executed four bonds to the state, on three of which this plaintiff was surety, and on the other, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States F. & G. Co. v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Wasco Co. v. New England Equitable Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. City & County of Denver v. StengerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. State ex rel. Rankin v. Madison State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Upham v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Hindman v. United StatesOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State v. McVeyOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Peninsula Drainage District No. 2 v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. WITHERS v. ReedOregon Supreme Court · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API