Upham v. Bramwell
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOUBT, J.
On February 16, 1922, the State Bank of Portland, Oregon, a state bank, was insolvent, and upon that date was, by its officers and directors, placed in the possession of the defendant, *601as superintendent of banks, to administer its affairs and liquidate its assets in conformity with the statutes governing’ the liquidation of insolvent state banks. Prior to its insolvency the bank conducted a commercial banking business and also maintained a savings department established in the manner prescribed by statute.
Defendant has converted a part of the assets of the insolvent bank into cash; about one…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Harrison v. PereaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Lippitt v. Thames Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kidder v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Tatlebaum v. Pantex Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Re Faling EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ClintonOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Gilbertson v. Culinary Alliance & Bartenders' UnionOregon Supreme Court · 1955
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.