Legal Opinion
United States F. & G. Co. v. Bramwell
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 1923PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.
The plaintiff, the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, appeals from a decree sustaining a general demurrer to its complaint and dismissing its suit. The complaint alleges, among others, the following facts: That the state treasurer, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Title XXIV, Or. L., deposited $4,005.92 of funds belonging to the state in the Crook County Bank of Prineville, Oregon, a state bank. The plaintiff, under the provisions of Section 2739, Or. L., executed, as surety, its bond to secure the repayment to the state of the funds so deposited. The bond was conditioned that…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Smith v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. State Bank of NCSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and GriggSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. v. Centennial InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Smith v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- E. B. & A. C. Whiting Co. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- South Philadelphia State Bank's InsolvencySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.