Legal Opinion

Peninsula Drainage District No. 2 v. City of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1958PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

This is a suit hy the plaintiff Peninsula Drainage District No. 2 for the foreclosure of certificates of delinquency issued and held by the plaintiff district. The defendants are the City of Portland and the State of Oregon. The certificates were issued on account of purported assessments levied against a tract of land which at the time of the levy was owned by the United States of America. Subsequent to the making of the assessments the tract against which the assessments were made was acquired by the defendants severally. Parcel “A” of said tract described in the complaint became the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Van Brocklin v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Lucas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Fullerton v. LammOregon Supreme Court · 1945

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Oregon Medical Ass'n v. RawlsOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Tharalson v. State Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Dunn v. City of RedmondOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. American Refrigerator Transit Co. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Tax Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API