Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Paulk

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 21, 1963No. 16,098PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

FERGUSON, Judge:

The accused was tried by general court-martial upon a charge of larceny, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 121, 10 USC § 921, found guilty, and sentenced to bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement at hard labor for one year, and reduction to the grade of basic airman. Intermediate appellate authorities affirmed, and we granted review on two issues, one of which deals with the contention that the specification of the Charge is “doubly duplic*457itous” and that the law officer erred in refusing to grant a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. AutreyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  3. United States v. MaynazarianUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  4. United States v. MeansUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  5. United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. BratcherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. CarterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  3. United States v. PooleU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  4. United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  5. United States v. AloyianUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API