Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Poole

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 26, 1987No. ACMR 8600988PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

DeFORD, Senior Judge:

The appellant was tried by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial at Fuerth, Federal Republic of Germany. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of wrongfully uttering checks with intent to defraud2 and, contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of larceny of blank checks, in violation of Articles 123a and *541121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 923a and 921 (1982 and Supp. II 1984)[hereinafter cited as UCMJ]. His approved sentence, pursuant to a pretrial agreement, included a dishonorable discharge, confinement for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. HardenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  4. United States v. KleinhansUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  5. United States v. HendonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. PooleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
  3. United States v. MinceyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  4. United States v. NeblockU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994
  5. United States v. RupertU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API