Legal Opinion

Steers v. Holmes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo. (Buck, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.. The facts are stated in the opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is an action brought upon a promissory note reading as follows:

“$1,250.00. Dec. 18, 1885.
“For value received, I hereby promise to pay George Steers or bearer twelve hundred and fifty dollars on or before the 18th day of September next, with interest.

* “ Sidney Stearns.

“H. A. Holmes.
“A. E. Stearns.
“ A. J. Holmes.”

There were two indorsements of payments on the same, —$155, January 4, 1886, and $100 November 19, 1887. These payments were made by Sidney Stearns.

The defendant Andrew J. Holmes alone pleaded to the declaration. His plea was the general issue, under which he gave notice that, if…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moies v. BirdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. Bogue v. PrentisMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Leonard v. WoodwardMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Robbins v. BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Christie v. KeatorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baker v. Union Stock Yards National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Ailes v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Burt v. GageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Goebel Brewing Co. v. MedburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Holder v. DormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API