Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Brooks

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1879PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Berrien. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Mrs. Brooks sued Bobbins & Nickerson as joint makers of a promissory note made payable to the order of Alfred Osborne, endorsed by Osborne to Hopkins & Jackson, and by them to her. The chief defense relied on was a set-off belonging to Bobbins against Hopkins & Jackson. It was claimed this set-off was acquired in season to attach against the note, and also that Bobbins being principal and Nickerson surety, the claim, although a sole' claim in favor of Bobbins, was available for the benefit of both" defendants.

A minor question was raised that Nickerson signed the. note after it had become…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Willoughby v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Michigan State Bank v. TrowbridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Steers v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API