Legal Opinion

Ailes v. Miller

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1913No. 7,935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Boone Circuit Court; James V. Kent, Special Judge. Action by Samuel Ailes against Matthew G. Miller. Prom a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Appellant relies for reversal of the judgment rendered in this cause on an exception to the overruling of his motion for a new trial.

The evidence shows that on February 2, 1909, Joseph S. Miller applied to appellant for a loan of $420, representing that he had immediate use for that amount of money. He said he was about to sell a carload of cattle, and would repay the loan at any time. He further said that he would secure the note, and would give his father, appellee, as surety thereon. Appellant agreed to make the loan, and at once gave Miller a check for $420. A note was then prepared by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Smith v. . MollesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Clodfelter v. HulettIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. McNaught v. . McClaughryNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  4. Crossan v. MayIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Bingham v. KimballIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Otto v. Republic Nat. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. Van Houten v. Van HoutenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Burt v. GageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API