Legal Opinion

Holder v. Dorman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1957No. Calendar 47,011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

(for affirmance). Plaintiff brought this action to recover on a promissory note in the sum of $6,000, without interest, executed and delivered to him by defendant Dorman on April 19, 1951. Some 2 or 3 days thereafter defendant Higgins indorsed the instrument, which on its face was payable on demand. Payment having been refused, plaintiff brought suit on November 5, 1951. Defendants filed separate answers to the declaration, each denying liability and alleging want of consideration for the note in question.

Trial was had before a jury which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Steers v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Blain v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Fitzgerald v. BixlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Van Houten v. Van HoutenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  5. Devitt v. FosterMississippi Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Loney v. McPhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Loney v. McPhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API